Forest Update 0 3
prev toc next
Published by Russian NGOs Forest Club and Socio-Ecological Union Press-service
N 3 (August 8 1997)

Dear all! We are happy to send out the third Forest Update though again there are more alarming than good news. We also hope that in the fall coming people will be back from the fields and forests and be more active sending us news. On the other hand, the list subscribers number is growing even now in summer, which is pleasant. The Forest Update English Version N4 will come to you later than in fortnight - in early September, as I am leaving for two-week vacation, so if you have something urgent, please contact me until August 13.

Coming fall promises lots of forest activities, forest meetings and forest news in Russia, so see you all in September,

Sincerely yours, Forest Update English version editor,
Olga Berlova (press@cci.glasnet.ru)

The Leningrad Region

The commission on karelian isthmus uncovers unprecedented forestry violations
"Wild" loggings done by Russian and foreign timber companies at Karelian isthmus under the blessing of Leningrad region forestry officials caused numerous protests from environmental movement and concerned citizens. Finally, the Governor of the region agreed to form an interdepartmental commission for revision of forestry and forest stewardship at the Karelian isthmus. For the first time NGOs participated in such high level commission - the Russian NGO's Forest Club representatives were in the group.

The almost two moth work of the commission revealed numerous violations, practically all forestry norms and instructions were abused. The commission working papers show almost all types of present forestry larceny. Experts say that these results could be scaled to all Russia.

The introduction of the "Leningrad" kind of so-called "Scandinavian Technology", which has little in common of the technologies in Scandinavian countries lead to totally uncontrolled loggings and no account for trees sold on stand and timber logged. The true amount of trees logged at certain areas would exceed 5 times of amount indicated in logging permit. The 50% to 100% overloggings became a rule, and majority of companies because of invalid account system would not pay for it.

According to Commission, total oveloggings at Karelian isthmus are about 140% of amount showed in logging permits. Besides that, the use of pseudoscandinavian technology lead to almost total elimination of differences between different forest groups - and often logging amount in protected zones exceeds logging in commercial zones.

The Russian official forestry lowest level entities are leskhozy. Almost every of those examined by commission has violated forestry rules. For example, almost 30% loggings are done by other bodies than leskhozy through passing the logging permit. Practically this means selling trees on stand.

Most of the loggings are export to Finland oriented. Investigation showed that every timber truck carries from 15% to 20% timber more than indicated in custom declaration, frequently prefect saw timber is smuggled as paper and pulp balance. The plans to create protected area network are threatened because significant part of Karelian isthmus forests are rented by different timber companies. The subject for rent became even planned and existing protected territory areas. The Region Governor V. Gustov promised that all measures will be taken to correct the situation, but there is a possibility that this all will end in some kind of "exemplary execution" of couple low-level officials.

Legislation

Loggers cutting russian forestry legislation
The statement of Russian forestry legislation to be the one of the most environmental friendly will no longer remain unchallenged. Russian NGO's Forest Club discovered that in addition to the new Forest Code Russian Forestry Service in secrecy is cooking up new instructions and rules. Nevertheless we managed to get the project of "Rules for selling trees on stand", which is one of the main forestry documents. Its close examination revealed very dangerous trend that the forest service main task is not care for forests but timber extraction.

Here are the most dangerous items: "The problems with application of commercial forest use rules, maintenance loggings and resin extraction rules, as well as questions on forest logging funds concerning width and neighboring terms of clearcuts, specifics of different tree species logging are solved by federal forestry body on request from executive power branches of Russian federation subjects".

This bureaucratical text, however, has a very clear meaning that regional governments may press Federal forestry service to get any kind of ease on legislation, including existing norms violation. The "Rules" also do not foresee any liability for overlogging, this will lead to both forest degradation and budget loosing money - the example we can see at Karelian isthmus. But what the "Rules" do provide is that logging permits for sanitary clearcuts are issued by leskhozy depending on economy issues. But this also violates science and existing Sanitary rules for forests of Russian federation, clearly stating that sanitary clearcuts are done only based on investigation of forest condition in cases forest lost its biological stability because of massive tree damage and not because of economy needs. In case this becomes accepted the massive unjustified loggings will be conducted as sanitary. In fact, this will legally justify now illegal practices.

There is also an attempt made to gain control over protected territories: one of the articles provides for leskhozy control over Nature Parks. This document is another attempt to solve economical problems sacrificing environmental interests, but we already have negative experience of overloggings done for economical reasons after W.W.II. Should we repeat mistakes of the past in much less critical situation?

Protected Area In Danger!

Is the Black Sea coast hostage to the caspian pipeline consortium?
The Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) was founded in order to construct a 1500-km. pipeline for transporting crude oil from the Tenghiz deposit in Kazakhstan, across Russia, to a terminal on the Black Sea coast near Novorossiisk. The CPC has proposed building its terminal in the sea near the Yuzhnaya Ozereika settlement, and its oil storage facilities on the territory of Abrausski Zakaznik [special purpose nature preserve]. The coastal area west of the Zakaznik, as well as the Zakaznik itself, has been promoted for inclusion within the planned Utrish Biosphere Reserve (please see the related box). Eastern Mediterranean relict juniper and pistachio forests, so scarce in the region, grow here, and the valuable vineyards whose grapes are used in making the world-renowned Abrau-Durso wine have brought fame to the site. The sea waters near the Abrausski Peninsula, harboring numerous rare species of hydrobionts, constitute the clearest and least polluted or disturbed section of the Russian Black Sea Coast.

****BOX***************************************************

Work on designing Utrish Biosphere Zapovednik is currently under way. It would incorporate the Abrausski Zakaznik, which was established to protect the relict oak, pistachio and juniper forest habitats of some rare insects and several rare Mediterranean plant species, most of which exist only in this area and are included in the Red Book of Russia. Twenty-nine species of butterfly, several mollusk species, as well as numerous aquatic invertebrates and terrestrial mammals, are also sheltered here.

Creation of the Biosphere Zapovednik was defined as urgent by the State Committee on Environmental Protection; plans are expected to be completed in 1997. However, the specific characteristics of the region - the numerous land users, recreational zones and resorts and consequently complicated land relations - are delaying progress. The administration of Anapa (a resort area) has finally gotten permission to establish one of the Zapovednik's two planned sites in its region; however, the other site of Utrish Zapovednik, proposed for Novorossiisk Region, has not been approved by the regional administration so far.

Rainbow Keepers, a radical NGO, staged a protest action against the pipeline project on July 2 to 4. On the first day, more than 1,500 Novorossiisk residents signed a petition against the proposed construction of the oil terminal. The Rainbow Keepers also met with the Novorossiisk administration and asked that they reject the plans for terminal construction near Yuzhnaya Ozereika settlement and promote creation of the Novorossiisk section of Utrish Biosphere Zapovednik. ***************************************************************-

Originally established in 1992 by the governments of the Russian Federation, Kazakhstan and Oman Sultanate, the Consortium has since welcomed several international oil companies into its circle, according to an agreement signed in December 1996. The pipelines initial capacity is expected to be 28 million tons of crude oil per year, with a projected capacity of up to 67 million tons annually by the year 2014. The total cost of the project is $4 billion, and construction is expected to go on from 1997 to 1999.

Novorossiisk is the largest oil port in Russia, with already developed facilities and infrastructure. However, CPC is not even considering use of the existing facilities, now being used by the federal company Transneft.“ CPC prefers to build its own, new terminal in another place that will be totally under the control of CPC members. One reason for choosing this project so dangerous for the fragile Black Sea coast is its cost: it's less expensive for the pipeline-builders because it requires the shortest distance from the pipeline to the sea.

Potential risks include seismic activity: Novorossiisk Region has a seismic index of 8.3, and Yuzhnaya Ozereika is an area of potential tectonic motion. Further, the sea at Novorossiisk and its environs is characterized by strong hurricanes that can throw even large vessels onto land. These factors make accidents far too possible, especially considering the low level of our technological discipline.

Despite the potential hazards, the Environmental Impact Assessment, conducted by a special commission, was halted in May, 1996 at the request of Consortium members, because CPC was undergoing reorganization of its structure.

The population of Krasnodarski Krai, environmental organizations and twelve politically diverse public organizations in the region have opposed the project.

The parts of the CPC project that touch protected areas and threaten coastal ecosystems contradict the principles of the "Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the Black Sea", signed in Istanbul in October 1996 by the governments of Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine. For example:

"The marine and coastal areas, and in particular in wetlands, new conservation areas shall be designated and the protection of existing conservation areas enhanced. In drafting their National Biological Diversity Strategies, Black Sea states shall take into consideration the integrity of the Black Sea system by, for example, designating conservation areas which are of regional significance."

The designated conservation area of Abrausski Zakaznik and the planned Utrish Biosphere Reserve, as well as coastal ecosystems, deserve serious defense from international encroachers.

**If you want more information or want to support the actions - please contact Victoria Kolesnikova ,(press@cci.glasnet.ru).

BALTIC NEWS

Today this is just a news gathered from Baltic press, but we hope that Baltic states representatives will also join our informational network and we will have their news and comments. It is especially important for us in CIS because we have almost no update of what is going on there with forest issues.

Latvia

Unique oaks as a gift to Australia it does not need
The Latvian officials decided to restore vessel "Duyfken" which discovered Australia 400 years ago and give it a as present to the country during the 2000 Sydney Olympics. The original ship was built of Latvian oaks, and "Duyfken" restoration was considered as "raising Latvian prestige". Waving this slogan some Latvian newspapers called peasants to cut oaks and deliver them for ship construction. Now the last oakwoods are under threat - experts say that to construct such a vessel as "Duyfken" will take almost 400 oaks.

The first victim of this culturally valuable initiative became projected nature reserve at the river Gauya bank in the Zile forestry area (North-west of Latvia). Company "Silva impex" cut 19 oaks there, their average age was 200 years. Neighboring trees were hurt while transporting logs. Witnesses say that once solid wood now looks like fragmented tree groups. "Silva impex" cut hollow trees as well, only straight logs were taken away

Experts say that oak wood in the Zile area are unique for biodiversity - 17 rare plant animal species are found there, the ancient forest is a perfect habitat because it has hollow and fallen trees.

Once broadleaf tree forests covered the majority of Latvia, but most of them were cut for ship construction during the prince Jacob and Peter the Great times. Now one can see only leftovers of the past magnificence.

Latvian ornithology society contacted dr. David Beiker-Gab of "Birds of Australia" and received an answer stating that there is nothing known in Australia about "Duyfken" construction: "I contacted the Olympics Organizational Committee in Sydney and learned that they know nothing about ship constructions and traveling on it. It has no official connection to upcoming Olympics."

Information based on "Rigas Balss" newspaper article

Lithuania

All the president's hunters...
Lithuanian Government decided to reserve area of total 7 982 ha for representational hunting. This area is meant for president's guest hunt. Part of the territory already had that status, the territories joined to it were previously used for hunt flock restoration.

Many people in Lithuania doubt the necessity of such hunt together with so called commercial hunts for foreigners. But these doubts are overrun by the profits coming of the hunts. Only last season brought in 1 mln 397 thousand lit, which approximately is 348 600 USD. The costs for trophies are the following - the noble deer male costs up to $1100, the wild-boar price is lower - starting from approximately $250.

The most frequent foreign hunters in Lithuanian forests are Germans.

Based on Business & Baltica newspaper

Issued by:

To this issue contributed: Victoria Kolesnikova
prev toc next

Should this information be used, please referr to Forest Update and inform us about it