Forest.RU Family: All About Russian Forests | The Oaks of Europe | Krasnoyarsk Center for Forest Protection
Forest.ru
Russian NGOs Forest Club
This site supported by Forest Club
All about Russian forests | Russian NGOs Forest Club | Useful links | Site map | Site search
Russian version

Forest Bulletin

News

Other Forest Club periodics

Forest Club Publications

Field Trips by Forest Club members

Forest Club workshops and conferences

Forest Club model projects and sites

-------
Forest Update
previous content next
Published by Russian NGOs Forest Club and Socio-Ecological Union Informational Coordination Center
# 02 (76) (february 2002)

Table of content:


The New Federal Law on Envronment Protection Is Adopted in Russia
   The new law on environment protection was signed by the President of Russian Federation and officially published. How should it affect the environment protection activity? A long time is required for the detailed analysis of the new legislation consequences, but the first impression is that it includes the world of good declarations that are so hard to realize in practice.
   If in 1991 there were two parallel processes - development of the environmental legislation and building of the state environment protecton service - now the situation is countrary: an independent environmental control is in ruins. So as many articles of the previous law worked only because of labour of former environment protection services officials, now it seems the new legislations remains a good intention only. Besides that, more environment control powers will be droven to the regional level, because the new law allows to restore regional environment services and give the local administrations right to carry out a state environmental examination (it requires changes in the law on the state environmental examination which are in preparation according to our sources), and the green organizations concern that such services will be under pressure of regional authorities.
   State inspectors now can only suspend environmentally harmful activity but have no power to cease it without executive body or court desicion. Despite mentioning the public environment control, there are no procedures of such a control in the new law and way of realization of this right is unclear. A detailed description of these procedures require an active work of the grassroots organizations.
   The new law on environment protection (in Russian): http://www.forest.ru/rus/legislation/laws/nature2002.html


The MNR Assessed the Cost of Forest Fires
   The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) summed up the fire protection measures in 2001 and estimated the damage caused by fires in Russian forests. As the MNR press-service states, regional forest service units and air forest protection divisions managed to decrease square damaged by fires by 538 thousand hectares. The total amount of the fire sites is 20,900 and square of anti-fire measures was 868 thousand hectares.
   The estimated damage caused by fires is more than 2.8 billion roubles. The most damaged are Komi, Buryatia, Altay, Tuva, Yakutia, Chukotka, Krasnoyarsk, Khabarovsk, Arkhangelsk, Murmansk, Kirov, Rostov, Volgograd, Chita, Irkutsk and Amur regions. 41.2% of the total amount of the fire sites an 93.3% of square damaged by fire is in these regions.
   The main causes of fires, besides hot and dry weather, are violation of fire safety rules and insufficent financing and technical equipment of anti-fire divisions. The Minister of Natural Resources Vitaly Artyukhov stressed that organization of dispatch points is needed to discover fire sites at an early stage and fight them successfully with land and air anti-fire divisions. Also the Ministry should develop a system of financial incentives for preventive anti-fire measures and fire fighting and introduce stricter punishments for forest service officials for misconducting of their anti-fire duties, Artyukhov stated.


Destruction of the Protected Areas Is a Tendency in the Newly Independent States
   The Ukrainian environmental ministry gave a permission to build a freestyle-jump at the Hoverla mountain - the highest and the oldest protected (since 1910) place in the Ukraine. The environment examination of the project based on the estimation made by Ivano-Frankivsk Oil and Gas University, though it's hard to explain what the sacred mountain of Hoverla to do with oil and gas. Besides that, Hoverla is situated in the Karpaty National Park, so the legality of the freestyle-jump project is dubious.
   "I think the anti-environmental activity of the Ministry create a dangerous precedence of changing the borders of the protected areas in the Ukraine according to business interests. The value of the Hoverla mountain is in its virgin wilderness and beauty and not in ski-jumps, sport bases and heaps of garbage," says Vladimir Boreiko, director of Kiev environmental and culture centre.
   In Russia such a dangerous precedence has already created. Last August the Moscow Arbitrary Court denounced the protected status of the landscape park Krylatskie Kholmy in Western Moscow for the same reason - the park prevented building of a ski complex. Near 100 endangered species both in Moscow and Karpaty are posed under threat by such kind of decisions.


The Forest Business Turns Green?
   A workshop "Aims and Methods of Living Nature Protection in Forestry" was organized by the Kola Biodiversity Conservation Centre with support of the Murmansk regional Committee of Natural Resourses. Forestries officals, forest protection specialists, business and NGO representatives took part in the discussion on environment demands to the timber purveyance in the region.
   "Our main aim was to explain timber industry the scientific base of NGOs work. We hope it helps to keep on the dialogue with industry and forest service authorities on environmnent protection in Murmansk region," said Victor Petrov, one of the organizers of the workshop.
   "The greens are like a public fire-squad. It's an indispensable harm for us. They want to have and influence to our activity and they're able to do it," stated Alexander Dvoryankin, director of one of the oldest regional timber companies Priroda Ltd. "We are a part of society and should take demands of NGOs into accound not depending on our wishes," added Alexander Glebov, head of Ogni Kairal timber company.
   At the round table that followed the workshop the representatives of the biggest timber companies of Murmansk region (Priroda, Sevmurmanles, Ogni Kairal, Alakurtti timber processing mill) announced a moratorium on cutting in the old-growth forests of the region. They also expressed their support to creation of 5 new protected areas which is now halted by regional authorities because of fear of losses for timber industry and related unemployment growth. "This decision could help the timber industry to decrease squares where timber purveyance is impossible because of the problems at the environmentally sensible markets," said Alexey Yaroshenko of Greenpeace Russia.


The Third FSC Certificate Was Given in Russia
   In December, 2001, the international audience company SGS gave the Forest Stewardship Council certificate on the forest management process of the Madok timber processing mill (Malaya Vishera, Novgorod region). Square of the certified area is 31,200 hectares. The project was initiated by Novgorod Certification Centre and WWF in 2000.
   One and a half year of the hard work resulted in the successful comp letion of the project. Madok became the third Russian and the first Novgorod region company obtained the FSC certificate. The company demonstrated its commitment to the highest standards of sustainable forest management.


The Results of "The New Year Tree-2001" Campaign Are Summed up
   The results of the regular campaign aimed to prevent illegal cutting of fir-trees before the New Year are summed up by the Druzhina (People's patrol) Movement. The Druzhina work could be divided in three direction. The first one is organization of environmental competitions among the schoolchildren aimed to attract their attention to the nature protection activity such as the new year bouqet competition in Novgorod or the youth naturalists action in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Khabarovsk region.
   The second one is a propaganda of artifical fir-trees or fir bouquets instead of living trees among the people. The good examples of such a work are a poll devoted to people's attitude to a replacement of the living trees with their equivalents in Kazan or the installation of the 12 meter high artifical fir-tree in the central square of Anadyr, Chukotka, supported by the local administration.
   The third one is the direct protecton of forests from the illegal cutting. Besides the traditional measures such as raids organized by Druzhinas in Vladivostok, Magadan and Vologda, in Primorye region branches of conifer were treated with the chemicals that are not harmful for trees but has a steady disodour at the room temperature.


Georgian Parliament against the Illegal Cutting in Protected Areas
   The illegal cutting of the unique sorts of trees at the protected mounain of Tsnelisi near a village of Tskneti, Znauri district, Georgia, attract attention of members of the Georgian parliament. The Chairman of the Georgian Control Chamber Sulkhan Melashvili states at the parliament Economic committee session that this case demonstrated the gap between people and the bureaucratic machine. He stressed that all the plots there illegal cutting was permitted by the district authorities should be confiscated but it should not affect the rights of the honest buyers. The first result of the scandal was dismissal of Shota Meparidze, head of Tbilisi Department of Forestry.

Issued by:
V. Kolesnikova, V. Tikhonov, seupress@seu.ru
V. Zakharov forestnews@online.ru
K. Pakhorukova, phrina@online.ru
previous content next
Reprinting is acknowledged. When using the information, please make a reference to "Forest News" and inform the editorial board.
-------


Back to top of this page Back to Homepage

Mail us!